ABSTRACT
Background & Aim: The long-term effects of human mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) treatment on COVID-19 patients have not been fully characterized. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a MSC treatment administered to severe COVID-19 patients enrolled in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial (NCT 04288102). Methods, Results & Conclusion(s): A total of 100 patients experiencing severe COVID-19 received either MSC treatment (n = 65, 4x107 cells per infusion) or a placebo (n = 35) combined with standard of care on days 0, 3, and 6. Patients were subsequently evaluated 18 and 24 months after treatment to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of the MSC treatment. The outcomes measured included: 6-minute walking distance (6-MWD), lung imaging, quality of life according to the Short Form 36 questionnaire, COVID-19-related symptoms, titers of SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies, MSC-related adverse events (AEs), and tumor markers. Two years after treatment, a marginally smaller proportion of patients had a 6-MWD below the lower limit of the normal range in the MSC group than in the placebo group (OR = 0.19, 95% CI: 0.04-0.80, Fisher's exact test, p = 0.015). On the SF-36 questionnaire, a marginally higher general health score was received by the MSC group at month 18 compared with the placebo group (50.00 vs. 35.00;95% CI: 0.00-20.00, Wilcoxon rank sum test, p = 0.016). In contrast, there were no differences in the total severity score of lung imaging or the titer of neutralizing antibodies between the two groups. Meanwhile, there were no MSC-related AEs reported at the 18- or 24-month follow-ups. The serum levels of most of the tumor markers examined remained within normal ranges and were similar between the MSC and placebo groups. Long-term safety was observed for the COVID-19 patients who received MSC treatment. Yet few sustained efficacy of MSC treatment was observed at the end of the 2-year follow-up period. Funding(s): The National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFA1105604, 2020YFC0860900), the specific research fund of The Innovation Platform for Academicians of Hainan Province (YSPTZX202216) and the Fund of National Clinical Center for Infectious Diseases, PLA General Hospital (NCRCID202105,413FZT6). [Figure presented]Copyright © 2023 International Society for Cell & Gene Therapy
ABSTRACT
Objectives: The 90-day double-blind phase (DBP) of the Phase 3 EASE study demonstrated accelerated wound healing for Oleogel-S10 (birch triterpenes) versus control gel in epidermolysis bullosa (EB). Here, we report safety and total wound burden results from the 24-month open-label phase (OLP) in which all patients received treatment with Oleogel-S10. Method(s): Total wound burden was assessed using EB Disease Activity and Scarring Index (EBDASI) and Body Surface Area Percentage (BSAP). Data are reported without visit windows to reflect a realworld situation more accurately, particularly considering the COVID- 19 pandemic. Result(s): The patient population was made up of dystrophic EB (n = 178, 86.8%) and junctional EB (n = 25, 12.2%);71.7% (n = 147) of patients were aged <18 years. 141 patients (68.8%) completed the OLP. The mean (SD) treatment duration for all patients was 584.7 (246.1) days. Adverse events were reported in 77.1% of all patients in the OLP versus 81.7% of those receiving Oleogel-S10 in the DBP. Mean BSAP for patients treated with Oleogel-S10 in the DBP reduced from 12.1% at study entry to 6.1% with 27 months of treatment. Similarly, the mean EBDASI skin activity score in the Oleogel-S10 group improved from 19.6 to 15.1 after 27 months. In addition, reductions in both BSAP and EBDASI from OLP baseline were observed in patients who transitioned from control gel to Oleogel-S10 in the OLP. Discussion(s): These data support a reassuring long-term safety profile of Oleogel-S10. Furthermore, the reduction in wound burden previously reported with 15 months of Oleogel-S10 treatment is maintained to the end of OLP. This is encouraging given the nature of this chronic genetic disorder in which there is regular cycling of patients' fragile wounds.
ABSTRACT
The proceedings contain 96 papers. The topics discussed include: practical pharmacotherapy for opioid use disorder in the age of fentanyl;can COVID-19 cause acute psychosis in pediatric patients? a case report;a survey of bullying experiences in a child and adolescent psychiatric clinic population;acute emergence of suicidal thoughts following Lemborexant initiation: an adverse reaction case report;assessing the unmet clinical need and opportunity for digital therapeutic intervention in schizophrenia: perspective from people with schizophrenia;rapid antidepressant effects and MADRS item improvements with AXS-05 (DEXTROMETHORPHAN-BUPROPION), an oral NMDA receptor antagonist in major depressive disorder: results from two randomized double-blind, controlled trials;targeting lncRNA NEAT1 impedes Alzheimers disease progression via MicroRNA-193a mediated CREB/BDNF and NRF2/NQO1 pathways;and impact of AXS-05 (DEXTROMETHORPHAN-BUPROPION), an Oral NMDA receptor antagonist, on Anhedonic symptoms in major depressive disorder.
ABSTRACT
Background: ALG-000184 is a prodrug of ALG-001075, a novel, potent, pan-genotypic Class II CAM. CAMs are thought to have two mechanisms of action (MoA). The primary MoA affects pgRNA encapsidation resulting in inhibition of HBV DNA/RNA replication, as confirmed in CHB subjects receiving ALG-000184. The secondary MoA, which occurs at higher concentrations, regulates the establishment and replenishment of cccDNA, resulting in lowering of HBsAg, an effect that has not been reported to date with ALG- 000184. Method(s): ALG-000184-201 is a multi-part, multicenter, doubleblind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. In healthy volunteers (HVs), single doses up to 500 mg and multiple doses up to 250 mg were well tolerated with linear PK (Gane E., HBV TAG and APASL 2021). In treatment naive (TN) subjects with CHB, daily oral doses of 10-100 mg ALG-000184 for 28 days were well tolerated with linear PK and were associated with profound reductions of DNA/RNA regardless of HBeAg status or dose (Yuen MF, EASL 2022). Plasma exposures required to engage the secondary MoA are expected to be achieved at the 300 mg dose level. Data from a 300 mg cohort treated for 28 days are described here. Data from another ongoing cohort treated with 300 mg for 12 weeks will be presented at the conference. Result(s): Ten subjects were randomized to 300 mg ALG-000184 for 28 days and two to placebo. Two subjects randomized to ALG- 000184 were replaced due to missing data due to Covid-19 lockdown. Subjects were Asian, HBeAg positive, and genotype B or C. Mean baseline HBV DNA and RNA levels were 8.4 log10 IU/mL and 7.3 log10 copies/mL, respectively. One subject experienced a serious adverse event (AE) of pneumothorax>8 weeks after last dose which was considered unlikely related to study drug. No subjects prematurely discontinued study drug. All treatment emergent AEs were Grade <= 2 except for 4 Grade >= 3 alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevations, which an independent ALT Flare Committee assessed as not related to study drug toxicity. PK was similar to HBeAg negative and HV cohorts following body weight adjustment. Subjects dosed with 300 mg ALG-000184 experienced mean declines of 4.0 log10 IU/mL and 2.6 log10 copies/mL in HBV DNA and RNA levels, respectively, at Day 28. Three of 7 evaluable subjects who received ALG-000184 had HBsAg declines>0.2 log10 IU/mL (0.23-0.78 log10 IU/mL). One subject receiving ALG-000184 had unquantifiable HBsAg throughout the study. Additionally, one HBeAg positive subject in a prior 100 mg cohort had plasma exposures equivalent to the 300 mg dose level and experienced a 0.5 log10 IU/mL HBsAg decline. Conclusion(s): In TN HBeAg positive CHB subjects, 300 mg ALG- 000184 for 28 days was well tolerated, exhibited predictable PK and resulted in rapid and substantial declines in HBV DNA and RNA. Notably, 3 of 7 evaluable subjects from this cohort experienced HBsAg declines of up to 0.78 log10 IU/mL. These data suggest that ALG-000184 can engage the secondary MoA of CAM II. Cohorts evaluating 300 mg over longer durations are planned or ongoing.
ABSTRACT
Intro: With the first case of COVID-19 in Cuba on March 11, 2020, the Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology in Havana began an extensive vaccine program. Two vaccines based on RBD recombinant protein were developed, one for systemic administration "Abdala" and one mucosal vaccine "Mambisa". Abdala received the EUA in July 2021 and "Mambisa" completed its clinical development as a booster dose for convalescent subjects. Method(s): Two doses (25 and 50 microg) and two schedules (0-14-28 and 1-28-56 days) were evaluated in phase I clinical trials with volunteers 19 to 54 years old. The phase II and III clinical trials were also double-blind, randomized, and placebo-controlled, and included respectively 660 and 48,000 volunteers from 19 to 80 years. The anti-RBD titers were evaluated using a quantitative ELISA system developed at the Center for Immunoassay, Havana Cuba, and ELECSYS system from Roche. The RBD to ACE2 plate-based binding competitive ELISA was performed to determine the inhibitory activity of the anti-RBD polyclonal sera on the binding of the hFc-ACE2 coated plates. The neutralization antibody titers were detected by a traditional virus microneutralization assay (MN50). Finding(s): The Abdala vaccine reached 92.28% efficacy. The epidemic was frankly under control in Cuba after the vaccine introduction having reached the highest levels of cases and mortality in July 2021 with the dominance of the Delta strain. The peak of the Omicron wave, unlike other countries, did not reach half of the cases of the Delta wave with a significant reduction in mortality. The mucosal vaccine candidate "Mambisa" completed its clinical development as a booster dose for convalescent subjects reaching the trial end-point. Conclusion(s): Vaccine composition based on RBD recombinant antigen alone is sufficient to achieve high vaccine efficacy comparable to mRNA and live vaccine platforms. The vaccine also protects against different viral variants including Delta and Omicron strains.Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
Intro: Performance of SARS-CoV-2 antigen tests is described relative to RT-PCR cycle threshold (Ct) values. However, Ct values may not be consistent between tests from different manufacturers, or even between runs. Here we correlate the Roche Elecsys SARS-CoV-2 Antigen assay results to a quantitative RT-PCR readout as a more reproducible measure of viral load. Additionally, we look at the relationship between the antigen test results, viral load and infectious titer. Method(s): Longitudinal nasopharyngeal swab samples from patients (N=452) with severe Covid-19 pneumonia collected between 03 April and 28 May 2020 in a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled, multicenter study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Tocilizumab (COVACTA), were assessed for SARS-CoV-2 viral load (RNA copies/ mL) and a qualitative and semi-quantitative readout of Elecsys SARS-CoV-2 Antigen assay. Viral culture experiments were performed to determine the infectious titer (TCID50/ mL) in a subset of samples. Agreement analysis was performed to compare the results of the assays. Please note that the current intended use of Elecsys SARS-CoV-2 Antigen assay is the qualitative detection of SARS-CoV-2 antigen. Finding(s): We observed high negative percent agreement between the Elecsys SARS-CoV-2 Antigen assay results and the RT-PCR results, while the positive percent agreement was only high in samples exceeding a certain viral load and at earlier time points from symptom onset. Infectious titer values and both the antigen assay semi-quantitative readout and the quantitative RT-PCR results correlated well. Positive percent agreement of RT-PCR and antigen results in relation to infectious titer was very high in both cases, while negative percent agreement was moderate to low. Conclusion(s): These data show that in patients with high viral load the Elecsys SARS-CoV-2 Antigen assay correlates well qualitatively and quantitatively with the presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA and infectious virus as determined by RT-PCR and viral culture, respectively.Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
Background: High titer COVID-19 convalescent plasma (CCP) reduces hospitalizations among immunocompetent outpatients. This study evaluated recipient post-transfusion S receptor binding domain (S-RBD) IgG antibody levels and the association of progressing to hospitalization among unvaccinated outpatients with COVID-19 treated with CCP or control plasma. Method(s): This analysis focused on participants from a multicenter doubleblind, randomized, controlled trial comparing treatment of outpatients with COVID-19 convalescent plasma (CCP) or control plasma without SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. Participants with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection were transfused within 9-days of symptom onset between June 2020 and October 2021 (n=110 vaccinated control;n=105 vaccinated CCP;n=464 unvaccinated control;n=472 unvaccinated CCP;total n=574 control and n=577 CCP recipients). All subjects had specimens collected the day prior to transfusion (D-1), within 30 minutes after transfusion (D0), 14 (D14), 28 (D28), and 90 (D90) days post-transfusion. Ancestral SARS-CoV-2 S-RBD was measured by an in-house validated ELISA. All 54 COVID-19-related hospitalizations occurred within 2 weeks of transfusion. Result(s): Post-transfusion anti-S-RBD IgG levels on D0 were significantly greater for CCP (median=4 titer,log3) compared to control (median=2 titer,log3;p< 0.001) recipients. Neither sex nor age impacted antibody levels following CCP treatment at D14, D28, and D90. Vaccinated recipients had greater titers than unvaccinated recipients prior to transfusion with little change in titers post-transfusion. Unvaccinated recipients had low antibody titers on D-1 with CCP recipients exhibiting a significant increase in titer from D-1 to D0 compared to controls (mean fold change=1.89;p< 0.001). Among unvaccinated recipients, those who received CCP transfusion late ( >5 days after symptom onset) and had low D0 antibody levels (< 4.24 titer, log3) had the greatest proportion of hospitalizations (5.5%). In contrast, those who received CCP transfusion early (< 5 days after symptom onset) with high D0 antibody levels ( >4.24 titer, log3) had no hospitalizations. Unvaccinated CCP recipient anti-S-RBD IgG antibody levels on D0 correlated with donor anti-S-RBD IgG antibody levels (r=0.30, p< 0.001). Conclusion(s): Among unvaccinated outpatients with COVID-19, CCP recipient antibody dilutional titers after transfusion over 540 titer correlated with protection against hospitalization when transfusion occurred within 5 days of symptom onset. (Figure Presented).
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Critically ill COVID-19 patients undergoing cytokine storm are believed to have a worse prognosis and increased fatality rate. Ibuprofen is a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAIDs) that might prove beneficial for the early management of COVID-19 due to its immunomodulatory effects. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of the early use of ibuprofen to attenuate the severity of the course of COVID-19 and improve outcomes in patients diagnosed with a moderate case of COVID-19 disease. Method(s): This randomized, double-blinded prospective study was conducted from January, 2022 to May, 2022, which included a total sample size of 180 patients with moderate cases of COVID-19. The number of patients transferred to intensive care was used as a primary outcome with a proposed large effect size (0.8), alfa =0.05, and power=0.80, so 90 cases were included in each group. Secondary outcomes were inflammatory markers: C-Reactive Protein (CRP), serum ferritin, and interleukin-6 (IL-6), duration of hospital stay, and need for ICU admission. Result(s): One hundred eighty patients with moderate case of COVID-19 disease were divided in a 1: 1 ratio to receive ibuprofen (IG) or paracetamol (CG). The average age of the included patients was almost 41 years. Statistically significant differences were reported between both groups in terms of improvement in cough symptoms and lymphopenia in IG compared to CG (p= 0.034 and p= 0.044, respectively). Regarding secondary outcomes, statistically, significant differences were reported between the study's groups in terms of the mean number of patients transferred to the ICU in IG compared to the CG (p =0.0.047) and duration of hospitalization (p =0.013), with no significant differences (p > 0.9999) in the occurrence of side effects. Concerning the follow-up of the cytokine storm marker, there was a statistically significant reduction in serum cytokine marker compared to the baseline value (P < 0.05) in the same group. No statistically significant differences were observed when comparing both groups together in terms of serum ferritin level (p =0.570), serum IL-6 level (p =0.580), and CRP level (p =0.401). Conclusion(s): It can be concluded that early use of ibuprofen as adjuvant therapy in COVID-19 management is effective and safe to attenuate the severity of diseases and improve outcomes. Trial Registration: Project manager for the Pan African Clinical Trial Registry PACTR202202880140319. Registered 9th February, 2022-Retrospectively registered, (https://pactr.samrc.ac.za/).Copyright © 2023 Sobhy et al.
ABSTRACT
Background: Remdesivir (RDV) is a broad-spectrum nucleotide analog antiviral approved for the treatment of COVID-19 in patients who are hospitalized or non-hospitalized and at risk of progressing to severe disease. Here we present SARS-CoV-2 resistance analyses from the Phase 3 PINETREE trial. Method(s): PINETREE was a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of nonhospitalized participants (N=562) with COVID-19 and >=1 risk factor for disease progression, randomized to receive RDV or placebo once-daily for 3 days. The whole genome of SARS-CoV-2 was sequenced from nasopharyngeal swabs collected at days 1 (baseline), 2, 3, 7, and 14 using next-generation sequencing. Emergent amino acid substitutions in SARS-CoV-2 from participants treated with RDV were tested in a replicon system to determine if they alter sensitivity to RDV. Result(s): Resistance analysis criteria included all participants in the RDV group and 50% in the placebo group with viral load above the lower limit of detection for the viral load assay. Of 281 participants who met these criteria, baseline and postbaseline sequencing data were available for 115/130 (88.5%) participants in the RDV group and 129/151 (85.4%) participants in the placebo group (Table 1). Among these, emergent substitutions in Nsp12 were observed in 8/115 (7.0%) in the RDV group and 7/129 (5.4%) in the placebo group. A total of 7 emergent amino acid substitutions in Nsp12 were observed in the RDV group, but not in the placebo group. Among these, only one substitution from one participant (A376V;first detected at day 14), showed reduced in vitro susceptibility to RDV, with a half-maximal effective concentration (EC50) fold-change of 12.6 compared with a wildtype reference. The participant achieved clinical recovery by day 14. None of the other substitutions impacted RDV susceptibility (EC50 fold-change <=1.4). Emergent substitutions in Nsp8, Nsp10, Nsp13, or Nsp14 were detected in 10/115 (8.7%) of participants in the RDV group and 10/129 (7.8%) in the placebo group, with substitutions in the RDV group showing similar susceptibility to RDV as the wildtype reference (EC50 fold-change <=2.3). Conclusion(s): Overall, emergent substitutions in the SARS-CoV-2 replication complex including Nsp12 were observed with similar frequency in the RDV and placebo groups, with only one participant developing a substitution associated with reduced in vitro RDV susceptibility, indicating a high barrier to the development of RDV resistance in COVID-19 patients.
ABSTRACT
Background: Whether ivermectin, with a maximum targeted dose of 600 mug/ kg, shortens symptom duration or prevents hospitalization among outpatients with mild to moderate coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) remains unknown. Our objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of ivermectin, maximum targeted dose of 600 mug/kg, daily for 6 days compared with placebo for the treatment of early mild to moderate COVID-19. Method(s): ACTIV-6, an ongoing, decentralized, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, platform trial, was designed to evaluate repurposed therapies in outpatients with mild to moderate COVID-19. A total of 1206 participants age >=30 years with confirmed COVID-19, experiencing >=2 symptoms of acute infection for <=7 days, were enrolled from February 16, 2022, through July 22, 2022, with follow-up data through November 10, 2022, at 93 sites in the US. Participants were randomized to receive ivermectin, with a maximum targeted dose of 600 mug/kg (n=602), daily vs placebo daily (n=604) for 6 days. The primary outcome was time to sustained recovery, defined as at least 3 consecutive days without symptoms. The 7 secondary outcomes included a composite of hospitalization, death, or urgent/emergent care utilization by day 28. Result(s): Among 1206 randomized participants who received study medication or placebo, median (interquartile range) age was 48 (38-58) years;713 (59%) were women;and 1008 (84%) reported >=2 SARS-CoV-2 vaccine doses. Median time to recovery was 11 (11-12) days in the ivermectin group and 11 (11-12) days in the placebo group. The hazard ratio (HR) (95% credible interval [CrI], posterior probability of benefit) for improvement in time to recovery was 1.02 (0.92-1.13;P[HR >1]=0.68). In those receiving ivermectin, 34 (5.7%) were hospitalized, died, or had urgent or emergency care visits compared with 36 (6.0%) receiving placebo (HR 1.0, 0.6-1.5;P[HR< 1]=0.53). In the ivermectin group, 1 participant died and 4 were hospitalized (0.8%);2 participants (0.3%) were hospitalized in the placebo group and there were no deaths. Adverse events were uncommon in both groups. Conclusion(s): Among outpatients with mild to moderate COVID-19, treatment with ivermectin, with a maximum targeted dose of 600 mug/kg daily for 6 days, compared with placebo did not improve time to recovery. These findings do not support the use of ivermectin in patients with mild to moderate COVID-19. Primary and secondary outcomes.
ABSTRACT
Background: The currently approved vaccines do not induce sterilizing immunity against SAR-CoV-2 infection, and immunity wanes over time. A robust broad spectrum topical prophylaxis strategy could protect vulnerable populations in the face of continuous evolution of SARS-CoV-2. The algal antiviral lectin Griffithsin (GRFT), and an engineered oxidation-resistant variant Q-GRFT have robust entry inhibitory activity against SARS-CoV variants of concern, in addition to other respiratory viruses with pandemic potential. We designed a nasal spray to deliver Q-GRFT to the upper respiratory tract mucosa for on-demand use as a broad-spectrum prophylactic. Two clinical trials (Phase 1a and 1b) were conducted to assess safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of Q-GRFT nasal spray in healthy adults. Method(s): Healthy adult volunteers were enrolled in a Phase 1a double blinded, randomized study to receive a single dose of either intranasal Q-GRFT (3.0 mg, 2 sprays per nostril) or placebo at 2:1 ratio. Following a safety review, the Phase 1b study was initiated. Eleven volunteers in Group 1 received 3.0 mg dose once daily, for 7 days. After a safety review, 11 volunteers in Group 2 received a total of 6.0 mg Q-GRFT (3.0 mg twice daily for 7 days). Topical Q-GRFT concentrations were measured by ELISA in collected nasal and nasopharyngeal fluids. Drug levels in plasma were assayed to determine systemic exposure. Viral microneutralization cytopathic effect (CPE) assays were performed against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA-5 and MERS-CoV. Result(s): Eighteen adults (24-54 years;Males 58.3%, Females 41.7%;12 Q-GRFT, 6 Placebo), and 22 adults (aged 23-59 years;Males 52.4%, Females 47.6%) were enrolled in Phase 1a and 1b, respectively. In Phase 1a, a single dose of Q-GRFT maintained quantifiable levels in nasal passages and nasopharynx for up to 24 hours. Similarly, Q-GRFT was quantifiable in nasal and nasopharyngeal regions in the Phase 1b study. No dose accumulation effect or systemic exposure was observed. Nasal and nasopharyngeal swab eluates inhibited SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.5 and MERS-CoV in CPE assays. Q-GRFT did not modify olfactory sensation. No severe adverse events were reported. Thus, the nasal spray was deemed safe. Conclusion(s): Intranasal Q-GRFT was safe and enhanced mucosal SARSCoV-2 inhibitory activity in human volunteers. The results support further development of Q-GRFT as a broad-spectrum prophylactic against coronaviruses to curb ongoing infections, and for future pandemic preparedness.
ABSTRACT
Background: Zotatifin (eFT226) is a potent and selective inhibitor of eukaryotic initiation factor 4A (eIF4A), a host RNA helicase required for SARS-CoV-2 replication. In vitro, zotatifin demonstrates broad spectrum antiviral activity against all human coronaviruses tested. Zotatifin has physicochemical and pharmacokinetic (PK) properties suitable for convenient, single subcutaneous (sc) injection. This study assessed the safety, antiviral activity, and PK of zotatifin in non-hospitalized patients (pts) with mild/moderate COVID. Method(s): PROPEL is a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study in non-hospitalized pts with mild/moderate COVID. At randomization, pts must have had a SARS-CoV-2 positive test within 7 days and at least 1 COVID symptom. Pts were randomized (3:1) to zotatifin or placebo sc in 3 cohorts of 12 pts each. Cohort 1, 2 and 3 received a single dose (SD) of zotatifin of 0.01. 0.02 and 0.035 mg/kg or matching placebo. Safety (adverse event (AE) and laboratory tests), antiviral activity (mid-turbinate nasal swabs and saliva), and plasma PK were collected over 30 days. The primary endpoint was safety;key secondary endpoints included SARS-CoV-2 viral load (VL) and PK. The study was not powered for statistical inferential testing. Result(s): 36 pts were enrolled across all three cohorts and completed a 30-day follow up. Data is currently available for pts in cohorts 1 and 2, 18 and 6 of whom received zotatifin and placebo, respectively. Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. The most common AE was erythema at injection site in cohort 1 (44%) and cohort 2 (89%), vs. 0% in the zotatifin and pooled placebo groups, respectively. Other AE frequencies were comparable between zotatifin and placebo and no serious AEs were reported. The concentrationtime profile of zotatifin from cohorts 1 and 2 following sc administration was similar to that reported previously following IV administration, demonstrated a terminal elimination half-life (t1/2) of ~ 4 days, high steady-state volume of distribution (Vss) of 31 L/kg, and low plasma clearance (Cl) of 3.9 mL/min/kg. A faster time to viral RNA undetectability was observed with zotatifin vs. placebo (see Fig 1. Not statistically significant). Conclusion(s): Zotatifin was safe, well tolerated and demonstrated a trend in clinical antiviral activity in patients with mild to moderate COVID which supports further clinical development. Zotatifin sc route of administration supports a point of care treatment for COVID.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Poor outcomes in COVID-19 patients (pt) are associated with C5a-C5aR axis activation. A C5a-specific monoclonal antibody, vilobelimab (VILO), improves outcomes in critically ill COVID-19 pt in a Phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo (PLC)- controlled study [1]. Method(s): COVID-19 pt within 48 h of intubation were randomly assigned to receive 6, 800 mg infusions of VILO or PLC at a 1:1 ratio on top of standard of care. Predefined subgroup analyses by region and country were performed. Result(s): Forty-six (46) hospitals on 4 continents randomized 369 pt: VILO (n = 178), PLC (n = 191). VILO significantly reduced 28- (HR 0.67;95% CI 0.48-0.96;p = 0.027) and 60-Day mortality (HR 0.67;95% CI 0.48-0.93, p = 0.0163) using a predefined, unstratified per protocol analysis. Mortality rates at 28- and 60-days and VILO treatment effects, however, differed substantially between regions: Western Europe HR for 60-day mortality 0.59 [0.37-0.95], South Africa plus Russian Federation HR 0.62 [0.28-1.38] and South America HR 0.80 [0.46-1.39] (Fig. 1). The weak signal in South America is predominately driven by Brazil (n = 74), which showed a significant age imbalance with a median 9-years younger PLC group (44.5-years-old vs 53.5-years-old) with low 60-day mortality of ~ 32.5% in the PLC group versus ~ 43.3% in Western Europe. Adjusting for age group categories (<= 30, 31-40, 41-50, 51-60, > 60;Cox regression) for 60-day mortality changed the HR in Brazil (0.96 [0.44-2.10] for continuous age-adjustment) to values near the estimate for the entire study population (HR 0.77 [0.35-1.69] for age in categories), suggesting a by chance imbalance and not a statistically evident weaker effect in Brazil. Conclusion(s): Regional efficacy differences between the rest of the world and South America were driven by age imbalances between treatment groups, which do not diminish the robust efficacy signal for VILO in severe COVID-19.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: C5a-C5aR axis activation is associated with increased mortality in severe COVID-19. Vilobelimab (VILO), a C5a-specific monoclonal antibody, improved mortality in severe COVID-19 patients (pts) in a Phase 3 multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo (PLC)- controlled study [1]. A pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) analysis was undertaken to assess VILO and C5a as well as antidrug antibodies (ADA) levels in the study. Method(s): Forty-six (46) hospitals on four continents randomized 369 COVID-19 pts (VILO [n = 178], PLC [n = 191]) within 48 h of being mechanically ventilated to receive 6, 800 mg infusions of VILO or PLC at a 1:1 ratio on top of standard of care. Blood samples were taken at screening, Day 8 and at hospital discharge for VILO and C5a and at screening and hospital discharge for ADA. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays were used to analyze levels. Result(s): Screening blood samples for VILO and C5a were available for VILO (n = 93) and PLC (n = 99) from sites in Western Europe. On Day 8 after 3 infusions, mean VILO trough concentrations were 21799.3- 302972.1 ng/mL (geometric mean 137881.3 ng/mL) (Fig. 1). At screening, C5a was highly elevated and comparable between groups: VILO median 118.3 ng/mL, mean 130.3 ng/mL, PLC median 104.6 ng/mL, mean 123.2 ng/mL. By Day 8, C5a levels were reduced by 84.6% in the VILO group (median 14.5 ng/mL [mean 16.8 ng/mL], p < 0.001) versus a 19.6% increase in the PLC group (median, 119.2 ng/mL, mean 129.8 ng/ mL). Beyond Day 8, though PD sampling was sparse, C5a levels remained elevated for PLC whereas C5a slowly rose but did not reach screening levels for VILO. Treatment-induced ADA were observed in 1 pt in the VILO group (Day 40 discharge) and 1 pt in the PLC group (Day 25 discharge), both appeared independent of treatment. Conclusion(s): The PK/PD analysis shows that VILO efficiently inhibits C5a in pts with severe COVID-19 resulting in a robust clinical effect on mortality reduction without inducing ADA.
ABSTRACT
Background: Ensitrelvir is a SARS-CoV-2 3CL protease inhibitor approved in Japan under emergency regulatory approval system as an oral treatment for COVID-19. Here we report the key analysis results of 125 mg group of phase3 part (SCORPIO-SR). Method(s): This study was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebocontrolled study. Regardless of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination status and presence of risk factors for severe disease, patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 within 120 hours from onset were randomized to oral administration of ensitrelvir 125 mg (375 mg loading dose on Day1), ensitrelvir 250 mg (750 mg loading dose on Day1), and placebo once daily, for 5 days. The primary endpoint was time to resolution of 5 symptoms of COVID-19 (stuffy or runny nose, sore throat, cough, feeling hot or feverish, and low energy or tiredness), and the key secondary endpoints include change from baseline on Day4 in the amount of SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA and time to first negative of viral titer. The primary population for the primary and key secondary endpoints was patients with <72 hours from onset to randomization. Result(s): Median time to resolution of 5 symptoms was significantly shorter in 125 mg group (n=336, 167.9 hours) than placebo group (n=321, 192.2 hours) (p=0.0407). Mean change of viral RNA levels from baseline (log10 copies/mL) on Day4 was significantly greater in 125 mg group (-2.48) than in placebo group (-1.01) (p< 0.0001). The time to first negative of viral titer was significantly shorter in 125 mg group (n=199, 36.2 hours) compared to placebo group (n=211, 65.3 hours) (p< 0.0001). Mean changes from baseline in viral titers [log10(TCID50)/mL] were significantly greater in 125mg group on Day2 (-0.807, n=196) and Day4 (-1.108, n=197) than in the placebo group (-0.395, n=208 and -0.850, n=207, respectively) (p< 0.0001). (Table Presented) In the patients randomized within 120 hours of onset, median time to resolution of 5 symptoms was 189.7 hours in 125 mg group (n=582) and 200.3 hours in placebo group (n=572) (p=0.4352). No deaths or serious adverse drug reactions were reported in either group, and the incidence of serious adverse events between the two groups was comparable. Conclusion(s): Ensitrelvir demonstrated a significant reduction in the time to resolution of 5 typical symptoms of COVID-19, robust antiviral effects and good tolerability.
ABSTRACT
Background: Despite renal impairment (RI) being a risk factor for severe COVID-19, there are no approved antiviral treatment options for patients with severely impaired kidney function (eGFR less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 or kidney failure) in the US. At the time remdesivir (RDV) was initially approved for the treatment of COVID-19, the impact of renal impairment (RI) on pharmacokinetics (PK) of RDV, its metabolites, and the excipient, sulfobutylether beta-cyclodextrin sodium (SBECD), was not known. Method(s): Here, we report the PK data supporting dosing of RDV in COVID-19 patients with severely impaired kidney function. PK samples for RDV and metabolites (GS-704277, GS-441524) were collected in the Phase 3 REDPINE study in hospitalized COVID-19 patients with severely impaired kidney function. Participants in this double-blind study were randomized 2:1 to intravenous (IV) remdesivir (200 mg on Day 1, then 100 mg daily up to Day 5) or IV saline as placebo-to-match. SBECD PK was analyzed in a phase 1 study in non-COVID-19 participants with normal kidney function, mild and moderate RI who received 100 mg dose of remdesivir (containing 3000 mg SBECD). The population PK analysis included observations from healthy and COVID-19 patients with full range of renal function across all adult studies. Result(s): Geometric mean exposures (AUCtau) observed in REDPINE Study as compared to PINETREE Study increased up to 553% for the GS-441524 metabolite (dependent on renal elimination) and to a lesser degree GS-704277 (294%, minor renal elimination) and RDV (78.9%;an increase explained by factors other than renal function, namely, hospitalization and body weight) (Table 1). The increased PK exposures were not associated with new safety signals in this study (n=163 remdesivir, n=80 placebo). Population PK analysis identified baseline eGFR as a significant covariate for GS-704277 and GS-441524 clearance, but not for RDV itself. SBECD PK was characterized by short half-life (t1/2) (1.6 hours in normal renal function to 3.8 hours in moderate RI) and fast plasma clearance (7.9 L/h in normal renal function). Analysis of SBECD in severe RI (REDPINE) is ongoing, but accumulation is not expected based on its observed short plasma t1/2. Conclusion(s): Given the observed PK and the absence of any new safety signals associated with increased metabolite levels in patients with severely impaired kidney function, no dose adjustment is recommended for RDV in COVID-19 patients with eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2, regardless of the need for dialysis.
ABSTRACT
Background: COVID-19 is caused by SARS-CoV-2 and has is responsible for over 619 million infections and over 6.5 million deaths globally since identification in 2019. Infection during pregnancy is associated with increased adversity including increased risks of admission to intensive care, increased ventilatory support, preeclampsia, preterm birth and maternal death. Vaccination remains the best protection against severe disease. The majority of trials for novel or repurposed COVID-19 therapies including mRNA vaccinations have excluded pregnant or lactating women despite being an at-risk population. Broccoli sprout extract contains a naturally occurring phytonutrient sulforaphane which upregulates the Nrf2 transcription factor resulting in expression of antioxidant proteins, anti-inflammatory effects and has demonstrated anti-viral effects in-vitro . Severe COVID-19 results in excessive cytokine production resulting in a proinflammatory state with significant oxidative stress and multi-organ dysfunction with evidence of placental abnormalities in almost half of infected mothers. Method(s): CO-Sprout is a pilot, double blinded, placebo controlled randomised trial that is recruiting pregnant women ( n = 60) between 20 and 36 weeks completed gestation with COVID-19 diagnosed within 5 days. Participants are randomised to either broccoli sprout capsules (containing 21 mg sulforaphane) or identical placebo (microcrystalline cellulose) twice daily for 14 days. The primary outcome will be duration (days) of COVID-19 related symptoms and other exploratory outcomes including unplanned hospital admissions, birth outcomes, inflammatory markers, microbiome and placental changes. Patients are recruited through maternity departments at Monash Health and Jessie McPherson Private Hospital. Result(s): Trial in progress. Conclusion(s): Trial results to be published after trial completion.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Riluzole, a sodium-glutamate antagonist which is FDA approved for ALS has shown promising pre-clinical results and is clinically safe in SCI patients. METHOD(S): The RISCIS trial is an international, multi-center, prospective, double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled Phase II/ III trial. Patients with ASIA A-C, C4-C8 SCI and <12 hours from injury were randomized between Riluzole, at an oral dose of 100mg BID for the first 24 hours followed by 50mg BID for the following 13 days, and placebo control. RESULT(S): Due to the impact of the global COVID-19 pandemic this trial was terminated prior to completion. 193 patients were randomized with a follow-up rate of 82.7% at 180-days. No statistical difference was noted in the demographics and baseline injury characteristics between the two groups. At 6 months there was a median gain in total motor scores (TOTM) of 30.0 in the Riluzole group compared to 20.0 for the Placebo group. The improved motor outcomes did not reach statistical significance. Given the decreased sample size, additional sensitivity analyses were conducted. In the ASIA-C population, Riluzole was a significant improver of total motor scores (coefficient estimate: 14.10, p = 0.020) and upper motor scores (CE: 7.68, p = 0.040) at 6 months. ASIA B patients had higher reported independence, as measured by the SCIM score (45.3 vs. 27.3;p = 0.071) and change in mental health scores as measured by the SF-36 mental health domain (2.01 vs. -11.58;p: 0.0205) at 180 days. CONCLUSION(S): Despite the premature termination of the RISCIS trial due to the COVID-19 pandemic, 193 subjects were recruited into this trial. Primary analysis showed a 10-motor point gain in riluzoletreated subjects which did not reach significance. However, on secondary analysis, incomplete cervical SCI subjects (AIS B and C) showed significant gains in functional recovery.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Mesothelioma is a rare cancer with over 2500 cases diagnosed annually in UK. The disease is historically associated with poor survival and high symptom burden. Prior to 2022, there was only one NICE approved NHS treatment option and no agreed, long term second line therapy. Clinical trials investigating new therapies often opened in a small number of specialist centres resulting in significant travel for patients. Harrogate District General Hospital is part of the Harrogate & District NHS Foundation Trust (HDFT) and the smallest organisation within the West Yorkshire & Harrogate Cancer Alliance. Method(s): HDFT became a regional recruitment centre for CONFIRM, a double blinded, single agent immunotherapy versus placebo, clinical trial. Initially aimed at the third line setting, involving a 2:1 randomisation, HDFT enrolled patients from across the Yorkshire Region. The team included a Consultant Medical Oncologist, 2 Research Nurses, trial administrator and Regional Mesothelioma UK CNS, helping identify the trial and providing additional support to the research nurses and patients recruited. The team had to employ new strategies to manage the complexities involved. At the time, there was no consensus on alternative NHS treatment options. The window of opportunity to enter was often short making good lines of communication with referring teams essential. Co-ordination of appointments to minimise the burden of travel on this vulnerable group of patients was also vital. Result(s): CONFIRM showed improved overall survival in patients with relapsed malignant pleural and peritoneal mesothelioma [1], possibly influencing change in treatment options when NHS England announced interim drug use approvals during the COVID Pandemic [2]. HDFT recruited 18 patients (5.4% of 322 Nationally). 27 patients were referred and approached, 21 consented, 3 failing screening. Conclusion(s): CONFIRM at HDFT demonstrates that small teams can contribute to national research. References: [1] Fennell et al. (2021) [2][NHS England (2020) Disclosure: No significant relationships.Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V.
ABSTRACT
Background: COVID-19 in Africa was less severe with fewer reported cases, hospitalizations and deaths compared to other continents. However, the lack of adequate surveillance systems in Africa makes estimating the burden of infection challenging. Serosurveillance can aid in determining the frequency of infection within this population. This study is aimed to estimate SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence, describe the SARS-CoV-2 antibody (Ab) levels, and examine associations of seroreactivity among Ugandan blood donors. Method(s): Samples were obtained from the Mirasol Evaluation of Reduction in Infections Trial (MERIT), a randomized, double blind, controlled clinical trial evaluating transfusion transmitted infections. MERIT blood donor samples (n=3,517) were collected from Kampala, Uganda between October 2019 to April 2022. Additional blood donor samples (n=1,876) were collected from around the country between November-December 2021. Samples were tested for Ab to SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid (N) and spike (S) using an electrochemiluminescence immunoassay assay (Meso Scale Diagnostics, Gaithersburg, MD) per manufacturer's protocol. Samples seroreactive to both N and S Ab were considered Ab positive to SARS-CoV-2. Seroprevalence among MERIT donors were estimated within each quarter. Factors associated with seroreactivity from November-December 2021 were assessed by chi-square test. Result(s): SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence increased from < 2.0% in October 2019- June 2020 to 82.5% in January-April 2022. Three distinct peaks in seroreactivity were seen in October-November 2020, July-August 2021, and January-April 2022 (see Figure). Among seroreactive donors, median N Ab levels increased 9-fold and median S Ab 19-fold over the study period. In November-December 2021, SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence was higher among donors from Kampala (58.8%) compared to more rural regions of Hoima (47.7%), Jinja (47.9%), and Masaka (54.4%;p=0.007);S seroprevalence was lower among HIV+ donors (58.8% vs. 84.9%;p=0.009). Conclusion(s): Blood donors in Uganda showed high prevalence of Ab to SARSCoV- 2 by March of 2022, indicating that the infection levels were similar to many other regions of the globe. Higher seroprevalence was observed in the capital compared to more rural areas in Uganda. Further, increasingly high antibody levels among seropositive donors may indicate repeat infections. The lower COVID-19 morbidity and mortality was not due to a lack of exposure of the virus, but other factors yet to be determined.